.
Feedback

Letter to the Editor: Writer Disagrees With Town Cleaning Catch Basins on Private Property

Man says the proposal is in violation of Oxford P&Z regulations.

To my fellow Oxford Residents, before you vote on the municipal budget on Tuesday, May 15, 2012, I want to make you aware that the proposed municipal budget, if passed, is violating the Town of Oxford Planning & Zoning Regulations conditions of approval given to the 55 and over housing projects in the Town of Oxford. Let me clarify. The following two line items in the proposed Municipal Budget include this violation:

  1. Under the Highway Maintenance,  line item :  “Equipment – Rental of”  Actual was $35,136 and it is now proposed to $101,000 an increase of $65,864.
  2. Under the Water Hydrant Charges, line item :  “Water Hydrant Charges” Actual was $43,240 and it is now proposed to $82,874 an increase of $39,634.

During  the Town Meeting on Monday, May 7, 2012, I questioned the increase on both of these line items, and I was told by two members of the Board of Finance that 1) the “Equipment  - Rental of” increase now included the clean out of the catch basis on 55 and over housing projects in particularly Oxford Greens; and that 2) the increase in the “Water Hydrant Charges” now included the maintenance of the water hydrant’s for the 55 and over housing project in Oxford, again in particular Oxford Greens. It is now my understanding that $20,000 is being allocated to clean the catch basins and maintain the water hydrants at Oxford Greens and Meadow Brook. I was also told by the Board of Finance Members that this allocation of moneys was insisted on by First Selectman George Temple.

Although First Selectman George Temple’s intentions may have been good, as I stated earlier, if the proposed Municipal Budget is approved on May 15, 2012, is in violation of the Town of Oxford Zoning Regulations ARTICLE 5A, SECTION 4, SUBSECTION 4.2 B) which states “Ownership and Maintenance.  All interior roads shall remain private ownership in perpetuity and all Town road maintenance services shall cease at the perimeter property line of the development parcel.”

My suggestion is for the Town of Oxford to vote NO to the proposed Municipal Budget, send it back to a public hearing so that we can at least reduce these two line items, and bring the Municipal Budget back in conformance, and not violate the Town of Oxford Planning & Zoning and State of Connecticut Section  8-g which state only the Land Use Commission can put conditions on applications for Town Use, not a selectman or the Board of Selectman.

- David A. Robinson, Sr. - 226 Christian Street, Oxford

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Oxford Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Stephanie O"Connell, Lydia Brown and Chris Barre
Renee O'Connell May 17, 2013 at 12:39 pm
Thank you Paul. I just thought of sending it to you last night. I am going to do my best toRead More videotape it today. I will send it to you as soon as possible. Thanks for your assistance. Renee
Paul Singley (Editor) May 17, 2013 at 12:06 pm
Hello. I didn't hear about this until the last minute, so unfortunately I cannot go. I'm sorry aboutRead More that. However, I was hoping someone would be able to take a video of the girls performing the song and send it to me. paul.singley@patch.com. Thanks and good luck, girls!
Will Wilkin May 14, 2013 at 10:24 pm
Great to see IMTI leading the way into the solar future! I went to that school specifically toRead More become a solar electrician. It was before they had a solar program, at the time it was the E-2 electrical course. I see America has a chance to build prosperity again if we will be forward-looking about our manufacturing and energy strategies. My company, Made In USA Solar LLC, aims to contribute to that in a small way, doing what we can by only installing materials made in USA. Congrats to IMTI on their ambitious solar plans!
Dave April 18, 2013 at 10:33 pm
C ZAC beware of liberal gun grabbers,they talk out of both sides of their mouths. When the bill wasRead More being pushed through CT. legislative body most said this was the first step. It is not over just yet.
Roc April 18, 2013 at 07:20 pm
Archie, Your wrong. Constitutions were written for a reason not to determine whether it's a livingRead More document or not. Politicians and or Anti-Americans only believe that the constitutions are a dead document. They are excuses to put forth an agenda. Without Constitutions this country would be chaos and we wouldn't have the freedoms we have today. Only in your eye's does the words not apply because you think government can prevent and do anything they want. It's the people that rule, NOT THE POLITICIANS!
Archie1954 April 18, 2013 at 06:31 pm
That is looking at the Constitution as a dead piece of paper instead of a living document. LivingRead More Constitutions read as if they were written yesterday not over 250 years ago. Is the Constitution living or dead. When common sense and ordinary circumstances show that the words of the Constitution no longer apply then the document is dead. That is what occurs when weapons/arms have become so powerful and dangerous that having them available in the numbers you have in this country is tantamount to ultimate murder and chaos. This is definitely not what the Framers had in mind as shown by the words prefacing the 2nd amendment referring to a militia.