.

Analysis: On the Attack for the Senate Campaign

How much of a political ad is substance, and how much is bickering? Patch is here to help you visualize the answer in the race between Linda McMahon and Chris Murphy.

With the final presidential debate having taken place Monday night and Election Day now less than two weeks away, winners of all the various races taking place across the city and state will soon be decided. But more importantly, Election Day means, finally, an end to the political attack ad. 

It's an interesting dynamic, the political attack ad. A candidate must vie for position amongst the public not just by building themselves up in the voter's eye, but by also diminishing the standing of his or her opponent.

While an ad campaign might be understandable and encouraged, what about when campaigns get carried away? What level of attacking one's opponent is excusable and who would even be able to make that distinction? It's a subjective measurement. However, there are tangible things one can measure to gain a sense of what a campaigns priority might be. 

Could the argument be made that talking about an opponent more than one's self is talking too much about the other? An informal experiment was conducted to test just how often two candidates for one of the more contentious races in recent memory spoke about each other: Chris Murphy and Linda McMahon.

The bid for the United States Senate seat is being contested by former U.S. Congressman Murphy and business-savvy former WWE CEO McMahon. The race has been hot and vocal.

Only one of their names needs to be searched in email archives to receive roughly all of both campaign's releases, they talk about each other so often. Five from each house were selected at random for the test. One was selected from the finalists for a hand count and then all five were filtered through a word cloud generator.

The results are overwhelming. For Murphy, in a campaign statement released entitled "SHOCKING DEBATE ADMISSION: McMahon Won't Discuss Social Security Specifics on Campaign Trail to Avoid Disclosing Her Right-Wing Republican Plans," with four (!) subheads, Murphy's camp mentions McMahon directly or through pronouns like "she" or "her" 41 times. Murphy's name is mentioned twice.

Not to be outdone without a fight, McMahon, in a statement released entitled "Chris Murphy Does Not Respect Women in The Workplace," with only a single subhead, her camp manages to mention Murphy directly or by the pronouns "he" or "his" 36 times. She manages to squeeze in six mentions of herself. 

The results of the word cloud test confirm more of the same. By an outstanding margin, the political rival's name is used more often than any other talking point in each of the releases tested, and completely overshadowed any mentions of their own names.

So, when this election season is over, voting day won't just end political ads. It will just bring temporary relief to the phenomenon of grownups talking about each other. On Nov. 7, finally, everyone will get to put down their stones.

xxxoxox October 25, 2012 at 10:44 PM
The debates showed that Mcmahon spent all her money on media and little educating herself on the issues. The new polls reflect the fact that the thinking people see that Linda is trying to take the lazy way to power. Her money is working hard but we actually need someone who remembers how you work when other peoples lives are at stake. We need experience in the Senate - not a rookie

Boards

More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something