.
Feedback

Board Settles Lawsuit With Former Superintendent

Former Oxford school chief Judith Palmer was seeking back pay and damages.

 

The Board of Education voted Tuesday to settle a lawsuit with former Superintendent Judith Palmer, who sued the school district after she claimed Oxford owed her back pay of approximately $4,200.

The board, which discussed details of the settlement agreement behind closed doors with its attorney for more than an hour, voted 6-3 to approve that agreement. However, the board refused to release details of the settlement with the public or the press.

Board Chairwoman Paula Guillet said the reason for silence at this point is that the deal is not finalized. The board's attorney said settlement details would not be made public until the agreement is signed by all parties. At that point, it would be a public document available through the Freedom of Information Act.

"We will not be releasing any further details about the settlement until it is finalized," Guillet said.

Palmer, who worked as head of Oxford schools for about five years, left the district in the summer of 2010 at a base salary of $132,444 a year. She was to be paid biweekly payments of $5,170. She says that she was paid just $970.80 in her last paycheck, leaving her $4,198.20 short of what she should have been paid.

In a lawsuit she filed in November, Palmer said she suffered mental and emotional stress and has incurred legal fees. She was seeking damages for lost money, compensatory damages, and punitive and consequential damages. She was seeking double damages in excess of $5,000 and attorney's fees, costs, interest and “such other relief as the court may deem just and equitable.” She claimed a trial by jury at Litchfield Superior Court.

Background

Palmer's departure with Oxford schools was bitter and caused quite a stir among many supporters and those who sided with the school board that was accused of orchestrating a plan to oust Palmer. She ultimately resigned and took a job as superintendent of schools in her town of residence, Winsted, Litchfield County, where she is still head of schools.

In an attempt to recoup the money she was owed, Palmer filed a complaint with the state Department of Labor. A wage enforcement officer for the state concluded that she was owed the money, the lawsuit states.

The suit also states that former interim Oxford Business Manager Arthur Poole met with the wage officer and agreed that Palmer was owed $4,200. However, the school district's attorney, Michael McKeon, said Poole told him the district did not owe Palmer any money and that current Business Manager Rosemary Hanson agreed.

On April 16, McKeon wrote a letter to the labor department stating that the school board refused the payment, the lawsuit states. Many school board members said Palmer's claims were frivolous.

Still, Palmer's lawsuit states the labor department closed the case on April 25 and found the school board in violation of failing to pay Palmer properly.

How they voted 

* Yes = agree to the settlement agreement; no = not in favor of the settlement

Name/Party Affiliation  Yes No Paula Guillet - D   X   Lisa Hellauer - D   X Gerard Carbonaro - R    X Stephen Brown - D   X Diane Soracco - D   X Amy Cote - D   X Ted Oczkowski - D      X   William Neary - R   X Michael Macchio - R   X


Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Oxford Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Stephanie O"Connell, Lydia Brown and Chris Barre
Renee O'Connell May 17, 2013 at 12:39 pm
Thank you Paul. I just thought of sending it to you last night. I am going to do my best toRead More videotape it today. I will send it to you as soon as possible. Thanks for your assistance. Renee
Paul Singley (Editor) May 17, 2013 at 12:06 pm
Hello. I didn't hear about this until the last minute, so unfortunately I cannot go. I'm sorry aboutRead More that. However, I was hoping someone would be able to take a video of the girls performing the song and send it to me. paul.singley@patch.com. Thanks and good luck, girls!
Will Wilkin May 14, 2013 at 10:24 pm
Great to see IMTI leading the way into the solar future! I went to that school specifically toRead More become a solar electrician. It was before they had a solar program, at the time it was the E-2 electrical course. I see America has a chance to build prosperity again if we will be forward-looking about our manufacturing and energy strategies. My company, Made In USA Solar LLC, aims to contribute to that in a small way, doing what we can by only installing materials made in USA. Congrats to IMTI on their ambitious solar plans!
Dave April 18, 2013 at 10:33 pm
C ZAC beware of liberal gun grabbers,they talk out of both sides of their mouths. When the bill wasRead More being pushed through CT. legislative body most said this was the first step. It is not over just yet.
Roc April 18, 2013 at 07:20 pm
Archie, Your wrong. Constitutions were written for a reason not to determine whether it's a livingRead More document or not. Politicians and or Anti-Americans only believe that the constitutions are a dead document. They are excuses to put forth an agenda. Without Constitutions this country would be chaos and we wouldn't have the freedoms we have today. Only in your eye's does the words not apply because you think government can prevent and do anything they want. It's the people that rule, NOT THE POLITICIANS!
Archie1954 April 18, 2013 at 06:31 pm
That is looking at the Constitution as a dead piece of paper instead of a living document. LivingRead More Constitutions read as if they were written yesterday not over 250 years ago. Is the Constitution living or dead. When common sense and ordinary circumstances show that the words of the Constitution no longer apply then the document is dead. That is what occurs when weapons/arms have become so powerful and dangerous that having them available in the numbers you have in this country is tantamount to ultimate murder and chaos. This is definitely not what the Framers had in mind as shown by the words prefacing the 2nd amendment referring to a militia.