.
Feedback

Connecticut Receives $3.5 Million in Drug Settlement

A subsidiary of Johnson and Johnson needs to pay up after allegedly breaking the law, according to this press release from the Office of the Attorney General in Connecticut.

Attorney General George Jepsen and state Department of Consumer Protection Commissioner William Rubenstein announced that Connecticut has joined a $181 million dollar settlement agreement with Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a subsidiary of Johnson and Johnson. 

Thirty-three other states and the District of Columbia also are participating in the agreement, the largest multi-state consumer protection settlement with a pharmaceutical company. It follows an extensive, four-year investigation and stems from allegations that Janssen improperly marketed the antipsychotic drugs Risperdal, Risperdal Consta, Risperdal M-Tab and Invega.

Connecticut’s share of the settlement is $3,539,549. Approximately $3.1 million will be paid into the General Fund; the remainder will be paid into the Office of the Attorney General and DCP consumer funds and the DCP’s prescription-drug monitoring program.

The complaint alleges that Janssen promoted Risperdal for off-label use to treat Alzheimer’s disease, dementia, depression, and anxiety, even though the U.S. Food and Drug Administration had not approved the drug for these purposes, nor had Janssen shown that Risperdal was safe and effective in treatment of these conditions.

"The law prohibits off-label marketing for a reason: to protect the health and safety of consumers. This settlement will require this company to follow the law and end the practice of off-label marketing for these drugs," Attorney General Jepsen said.

Consumer Protection Commissioner William Rubenstein said, "This is an appropriate settlement that will presumably send a message throughout the marketplace that promoting medications for off-label use is off-limits for drug companies."

The states alleged that Janssen’s marketing of Risperdal, among a class of drugs known as atypical or second-generation antipsychotics, for unapproved or off-label uses violated the law as an unfair and deceptive practice.

Federal law prohibits pharmaceutical manufacturers from promoting their products for off-label uses, although physicians may prescribe drugs for those uses.

As part of the settlement, Janssen has agreed to change not only how it promotes and markets its atypical antipsychotics, but the company also agreed to refrain from any false, misleading or deceptive promotion of the drugs.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Oxford Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Denise Randall May 20, 2013 at 04:30 pm
That is wonderful!!! Super job!!!
Warren Webster May 20, 2013 at 04:27 pm
Thanks for posting this video - great message!
Paul Singley (Editor) May 20, 2013 at 10:56 am
Great job, girls!
Our daughter!
Paul Singley (Editor) May 20, 2013 at 11:06 am
Best of luck! Feel free to start a blog on Patch to get your photos out there for the community toRead More see!
Bear Sighting
Dawn Sotir May 20, 2013 at 06:37 pm
The bear was spotted on Punkup Rd on Sunday and then on freeman Rd Monday morning. Advise to takeRead More bird feeders in and secure all trash cans.
Me May 19, 2013 at 10:07 am
When I visited Colorado, they have these special garbage cans to the bears from smelling the food.Read More We are going to need those soon..
Stephanie O"Connell, Lydia Brown and Chris Barre
Renee O'Connell May 17, 2013 at 12:39 pm
Thank you Paul. I just thought of sending it to you last night. I am going to do my best toRead More videotape it today. I will send it to you as soon as possible. Thanks for your assistance. Renee
Paul Singley (Editor) May 17, 2013 at 12:06 pm
Hello. I didn't hear about this until the last minute, so unfortunately I cannot go. I'm sorry aboutRead More that. However, I was hoping someone would be able to take a video of the girls performing the song and send it to me. paul.singley@patch.com. Thanks and good luck, girls!
Will Wilkin May 14, 2013 at 10:24 pm
Great to see IMTI leading the way into the solar future! I went to that school specifically toRead More become a solar electrician. It was before they had a solar program, at the time it was the E-2 electrical course. I see America has a chance to build prosperity again if we will be forward-looking about our manufacturing and energy strategies. My company, Made In USA Solar LLC, aims to contribute to that in a small way, doing what we can by only installing materials made in USA. Congrats to IMTI on their ambitious solar plans!
Dave April 18, 2013 at 10:33 pm
C ZAC beware of liberal gun grabbers,they talk out of both sides of their mouths. When the bill wasRead More being pushed through CT. legislative body most said this was the first step. It is not over just yet.
Roc April 18, 2013 at 07:20 pm
Archie, Your wrong. Constitutions were written for a reason not to determine whether it's a livingRead More document or not. Politicians and or Anti-Americans only believe that the constitutions are a dead document. They are excuses to put forth an agenda. Without Constitutions this country would be chaos and we wouldn't have the freedoms we have today. Only in your eye's does the words not apply because you think government can prevent and do anything they want. It's the people that rule, NOT THE POLITICIANS!
Archie1954 April 18, 2013 at 06:31 pm
That is looking at the Constitution as a dead piece of paper instead of a living document. LivingRead More Constitutions read as if they were written yesterday not over 250 years ago. Is the Constitution living or dead. When common sense and ordinary circumstances show that the words of the Constitution no longer apply then the document is dead. That is what occurs when weapons/arms have become so powerful and dangerous that having them available in the numbers you have in this country is tantamount to ultimate murder and chaos. This is definitely not what the Framers had in mind as shown by the words prefacing the 2nd amendment referring to a militia.