Ambulance, Education Talk Dominates Oxford Budget Hearing [Video]

Town meeting on budget will be held May 7, referendum will be on May 15.

Oxford resident Amy Cote has two young children who have epilepsy. When one of them has a seizure, Cote and her husband, Steve, have precious few moments to get them oxygen.

The Oxford Ambulance Association, whose EMTs carry oxygen, a controlled substance, has been to her house on more than a few occasions to give the children air. But oftentimes the EMT vehicles are tied up on other calls and it takes them up to 45 minutes to get to the Cote home in the Quaker Farms section of town.

“My son has seized for 45 minutes straight; it’s terrifying as a parent when you are waiting on emergency services,” Amy Cote told the Board of Finance, with tears welling in her eyes, Monday night during a public hearing on the proposed town and school budgets.

Thirty people attended the hearing at to discuss the $40.8 million town and school budget proposal, which, if approved, would increase the tax rate .98 mills to 24.19 mills, a 4.2 percent increase. Much of the discussion during the two-hour meeting centered on the ambulance, which the Board of Finance has cut from the ambulance association’s budget request for a third straight year. Discussions and cordial debates also ensued about road repairs; how some people want to see a flat tax regardless of how it impacts municipal and educational services; whether the town’s finance director, Jim Hliva, should get a $12,000 raise this year; whether the town should clean storm drains in the private Village at Oxford Greens development for $20,000; and pros and cons of a 2.72 percent increase in the educational budget, which makes up 66 percent of the overall town and school spending plan.

Amy Cote, consequently, is an Oxford Board of Education member. While she backs the school board’s proposed $26.6 million budget, her main purpose at Monday’s meeting was to voice support for the ambulance request.  A third ambulance in town could make response times in Oxford substantially faster, she said.

Oxford Ambulance Association Director Jerry Schwab said last year the organization had 28 calls it could not cover in town because it didn’t have enough vehicles. The organization had trained volunteers on staff at the time of those incidents and could have sent someone, he said.

The ambulance would cost the town $165,000.

“I wouldn’t be doing my job if I didn’t bring this to the attention of the town,” he said, adding that additional strains will be put on the ambulance association soon because 146 additional housing units have been approved for Phase Four of the Village at Oxford Greens. “We can’t cover all the calls we have now, and the growth at Oxford Greens will put an additional tax on us… This ambulance has continuously been put off.”

First Selectman George Temple said he’s working with the town’s economic development director to bring more taxable commercial and industrial properties to Oxford in attempts to increase the tax base, thus taking a burden off residential taxpayers. Board of Finance Chairwoman Lila Ferrillo said, if the economic development materializes, “the first thing we will come forward with is a new ambulance.”

See the video attached of Temple discussing economic development initiatives and how they can bring tax relief. 

What Can the Town Afford?

Ferrillo said people have a misconception that the Board of Finance is cutting departmental budgets when, in fact, the board is “just not giving them everything they are asking for.” She said finance board members have spent many nights crunching budget numbers in attempts to justly balance the needs of town departments and the will of the taxpayers, many of whom struggle to pay bills in a tough economy.

Local budget watchdog Ed Spruck said the state’s Office of Policy and Management lists Oxford in the top 33 percent of towns in the state in terms of how much debt it owes. In other words, the town has a lot of bonds to pay off, Spruck suggested.

“So, you need to look at fiscal responsibility and what we can afford,” he told the finance board.

He noted the town will have some big expenses coming in the near future: “We need to replace (Oxford) Center School, we have roads to repair, we have an ambulance we’d like to have, we have building repairs that have been neglected for a long time.”

“So, if we don’t watch our operating budget, we’re going to be in big trouble,” Spruck added.

He also said the Board of Education has a surplus from this year. That is true, but not as much as Spruck suggested, school officials said.

Interim Superintendent of Schools John Reed said the surplus could be about $200,000 and the entire amount will go back to the town, which is required by state law.

Debate About Educational Funding

Oxford school board member Gerard Carbonaro had some numbers of his own to share with the Board of Finance. He said the town is in the bottom 7 percent in the state in per pupil spending.

“Kids excel despite not knowing what they are doing without,” he said.

Finance board Vice Chairman Jack Kiley said more money doesn’t always equal a better educational system. He pointed to Washington, D.C., which he said spends about $25,000 per pupil, more than double what Oxford pays.

“If per pupil expenditures translated into a better school system, then Washington, D.C., would have the best education system in the country or the world,” he said. “So throwing money at the problem is not always the answer. I think our schools do well, and they do very well for what we put into the school system. People rave about this school system.”

School Board Chairwoman Paula Guillet said there is “nobody on the board who thinks money should be thrown at the problem.”

“I think we have put together a very responsible budget,” she said, adding that the school board has cut about $1.5 million from Reed’s original proposal and that the town is not getting $230,000 from the federal stimulus program that it relied on in the past two budget cycles.

Still, resident Roger O’Toole, a former selectman who retired as a teacher from a technical high school in Milford, said was voting ‘no’ on all three portions of the budget at referendum: He said he’s voting ‘no’ because the town is hiring new people, buying new vehicles and because the town doesn’t operate like the average taxpayer who only spends what he or she makes.

He said he believes school board members and finance board members probably do a good job managing the portions of the budget they have control of.

“But for 30 some-odd years, we’ve been hearing these are bare bones budgets,” O’Toole said. 

Dad in Oxford April 24, 2012 at 10:33 AM
Help me understand why Oxford would ever pay $20,000 to clean storm drains at Oxford Greens when it is a private community? The members there pay dues/association fees and they are responsible for their own maintenance. Oxford residents are not allowed to freely engage in activities there, so why would Oxford taxpayers pay for maintenance on something we get no privilege of using?
Oxford Resident April 24, 2012 at 11:41 AM
Well said
Paul Coward April 24, 2012 at 12:37 PM
Oxford Greens residents pay a hefty real estate tax to the town of Oxford and receive very few services in return. We are entitled to the same services as the entire town. But, we pay an association fee to provide, among other things, snow removal, a service that is included in the RE tax for the rest of the community. We rarely see a police car making routine patrols. Our taxes help pay for the schools and other community services as well they should. I just wish that the finance committe would try to fund the budget by collecting the delinquent $10,000,000 in RE taxes and the $670,000 from the allewged thft by the former treasurer. Then, the community would be able to afford the amublance, the new ball fields, etc and we would not be facing the 4.5% tax increase.
Douglas Stolze April 24, 2012 at 12:38 PM
The School Budget Surplus does not go back to the town. The State of Ct in its infamous wisdom cause for mandated minimal funding thus even if you could cut your educational budget the following year you will be penalized 2 dollars for every dollar you receive in State aid. In addition if the BOE goes over its budget we have to pay the difference if they go under they keep the surplus as they have done in the past like 3 years ago when they had a similar surplus dint notify anyone and chose to spend such at their leisure. Education is important but this is ridiculous given salaries and benefit packages and operation costs that go up driving the budget break that down and show me the actual increase in educational spending per student. Also, they cut positions and when they get the chance they bring them back and add more. How is it that a town this size that 66% percent of its taxes pays for this nonsense we need a better fiscal accountability , better benefit packages reducing town burden and costs. It amazes me that they bring out all the teachers who say they sacrifice for the kids and many do but so do so many others including the families struggling to make the bills to get those kids to class and live and eat. DMS
CMG April 24, 2012 at 12:50 PM
Totally agree!!!!
Roc April 24, 2012 at 01:21 PM
Jim Hilva, $12,000 raise, I don't think so. I work in a much bigger city than Oxford and we only receive 2% raises, if were lucky. Ambulance I am for. Oxford Greens already pay for maintenance.They can have their own gutters cleaned.The Town is not responsible. I pay town taxes, Oxford doesn't clean my gutters.
John M. Joy April 24, 2012 at 01:42 PM
1. All of us have to provide for snow removal on our own private property which, depending on the size of one's driveway, can be laborious. And your property taxes cover snow removal on town roads such as Riggs Street and Jacks Hill... or do you take a hovercraft to/from home? 2. If you had taken the time to read a story or two (here, or in any of the area newspapers), you would know that the bulk of that "delinquent" ten million is, in fact, spurious. 3. The individual charged in connection with the alleged theft is a former tax collector, NOT treasurer. These are distinct offices.
Dad in Oxford April 24, 2012 at 02:27 PM
Doug, you are wrong. Any surplus (unspent dollars), goes back to the town and into the general surplus fund I believe. The BOE's budget is based on what they spent, not what they are allocated and that will be the baseline for which the BOF should consider additional cuts. As I see it, the $154k cut the BOF made should be offset by the BOE's surplus, so the net effect on the BOE should be minimal. I agree as well about Hliva's salary, NO WAY! 3% maybe, but nothing more.
Dad in Oxford April 24, 2012 at 02:29 PM
Paul, would you agree that if the taxpayers of Oxford continue to support your private community, that Oxford Greens should open its facilities and events to Oxford residents as well, even if we do not live there?
Truman April 24, 2012 at 11:10 PM
An why is Oxford Greens so special? How about Meadowbrook estates, they pay their fair share of taxes too. Maybe Oxford Greens people would like to open their clubhouse and swimming pools to the rest the Town of Oxford.
Truman April 24, 2012 at 11:15 PM
Not only is Jim Hilva's raise outrageous, but our new tax collector is getting a raise of $7106 or 14.2% which is also outrageous.
Ruby April 24, 2012 at 11:57 PM
The First Selectman is in over his head and does not know what a budget is. This is what he sends to the people?
Bernard April 25, 2012 at 01:38 AM
Looks like the anti-education hit squad (Ferrillo, Kelly & Kiley) has decided to make the cuts really hurt by deciding to cut another $100,000 from the BOE budget tonight. Forget about doing anything in this town or preparing at all for the future. No leadership. Just blind adherence to simple-minded mantras about what they owe "taxpayers" but no clear understanding of their moral responsibility to this community and the children that we all are responsible to adequately educating. The BOF has failed this town time and time again - despite the efforts of town employees to cover the gaps and make do. Eventually the roof will collapse on us. I expect that Ferrillo, Kelly and Kiley will leave most of us in the rubble while they ramble on about how they protected us.
Tony Soprano April 25, 2012 at 01:08 PM
What this article states are some of the subjects that were bought up by Oxford residents who attended this budget hearing at town hall that evening. Seems someone might of asked something like "Why can't the town pay for storm drain cleaning at Oxford Greens?" This question being asked by a citizen at that hearing does NOT mean that the item is included in the town's proposed budget. But I see from the many responses that perhaps some think it is included and they are comparing that item to ambulances and Board of Ed items. This is simply not the case and there are no budget funds in the proposed budget directed towards Oxford Greens . But prod away as you politicos will with your half truths and innuendos but that won't change a thing about what the whole truth is. The only thing that it will reveal is your self-centered and prejudicial natures which cause rifts where none existed before. You want to use the pool at Oxford Greens? You want to play cards in their clubhouse? No problem, simply make friends with a resident and they would be more than glad to spend an afternoon or evening with you as their guest. Oh, but that may defeat the whole purpose of your comments, won't it?


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something