.

Catching Up With Himes On the Campaign Trail

U.S. Rep. Jim Himes met informally with town Democrats at the home of Michael and Michele Mount in Monroe Saturday. The Obsitnik Campaign Responds to comments made.

 

Jim Himes is vying for a second consecutive term representing Connecticut in the 4th Congressional District. On Saturday, he stopped at the waterfront home of Michael and Michele Mount in Monroe to talk about the campaign during an informal meeting with town Democrats.

Republican businessman Steve Obsitnik is challenging Himes and the two candidates will lock horns in three debates before the election is decided on Nov. 6.

"I'm feeling optimistic," Himes said of his chances. "My constituents have come to know me as independent and thoughtful, whether they agree with me on every issue."

Himes' said his latest internal polling data shows him "substantially ahead" of Obsitnik, but he said one can never take winning the 4th District for granted.

He believes Obsitnik has done a poor job of defining where he stands on several key issues.

"He's not clear on Medicare vouchers and he refuses to say whether he supports the Republican budget," Himes said of Vice Presidential candidate Paul Ryan's budget proposal."

On Monday, Amanda Bergen, a spokeswoman for the Obsitnik Campaign, responded to some of the comments made by Himes and his supporters at the Monroe gathering.

"Steve has been pretty definitive, but the Himes Campaign has been pushing this narrative that Steve hasn't been taking positions," Bergen said. "They must not be listening, because Steve has been pretty specific about what he wants to do as far as preserving and protecting Medicare to reduce and balance the budget and to simplify the tax code."

Himes said he opposes Medicare vouchers, because the medical costs outpace the rate of consumer inflation and the Congressional Budget Office found that seniors would end up writing $6,000 checks that they cannot afford. Bergen said Obsitnik also opposes it, adding Obsitnik wants Medicare to remain the same for those age 55 and older. But she said changes must be made to keep the program solvent for future generations.

"Steve believes we need to put all options on the table and work together like grown ups in a bipartisan manner to come up with the best system instead of bickering," Bergen said.

Himes opposes the Ryan budget. When asked for Obsitnik's position on it, Bergen said, "Steve believes in a bipartisan solution to our fiscal disaster and he is willing to look at all options from anyone with ideas to share. Jim Himes has yet to propose his own plan. All we heard from him is empty rhetoric and blind partisanship."

Both sides tried to paint the other candidate as a rubber stamp for their own political party, while touting their own as being independent.

"Jim Himes is one of the least independent people in Congress," Bergen said. "Facts are the facts. He voted the party line 94% of the time. Steve has come out before party leaders on where he differs with the Republican Party. That's on women's reproductive rights and immigration."

While Himes believes he has a "substantial lead", Bergen says the two candidates are neck-and-neck as the race heads toward the finish. Obsitnik's momentum "exploded" last week when he was one of 40 candidates that the National Republican Congressional Committee named a "Young Gun", named for someone the committee sees as "one of the most promising and electable candidates in the country," according to Bergen.

Bergen claims Himes' "baseless attacks" on Obsitnik shows he's getting nervous. With 9% unemployment in Connecticut and "gas prices that have more than doubled since he got into office," Bergen said, "The bottom line is Jim Himes has failed."

Obsitnik and Himes have had one debate on Oct. 10 and three more are scheduled:

  • The Business Council of Fairfield County, The Bridgeport Regional Business Council and The Greater Norwalk Chamber of Commerce sponsored debate on Oct. 18 from 1-2 p.m. at Norwalk Inn & Conference Center, 99 East Avenue in Norwalk.
  • The League of Women Voters sponsored debate on Oct. 28 from 4-5:30 p.m. at the Clune Auditorium of Wilton High School, 395 Danbury Road in Wilton.
  • The AARP sponsored debate on Nov. 2, from 10-11 a.m. at the Bridgeport Holiday Inn, at 1070 Main Street in Bridgeport.

A Stop in Monroe

Himes mingled in the Mounts' kitchen over cookies and crackers with a small crowd that included Monroe Democratic Town Committee Chairman Nick Kapoor, Town Councilwoman Dee Dee Martin, Inland Wetlands Commissioner Dan Hunsburger, Board of Education member Dr. Alan Vaglivello and former Monroe first selectman Karen Burnaska — now serving on the Conservation Commission.

Everyone eventually moved into the living room, where Himes spoke about the election and what's going on in Washington before answering questions.

Himes said concerns over job creation in tough economic times has dominated what he has heard from people along the campaign trail.

"We have to get a budget deal done, so we have a path to reducing our deficits and debt," Himes said of other issues important to him.

From asking millionaires to pay more to the possible elimination of the tax deduction on home mortgages favored by the middle class should be considered in any negotiation, according to Himes.

"The wealthiest Americans are going to have to contribute to this national project for stability. Everything has to be on the table and up for negotiation," he said, adding of the mortgage deduction, "But we have to be careful about making any changes in housing because of the weak market."

Now three-and-a-half weeks from the election, Himes said people may start to feel a little fatigued, but added, "We can't let that happen in one of the most important elections in our lifetime. No one knows what Mitt Romney stands for. No one knows, if we elect him, if we'll get Massachusetts Gov. Romney or Conservative Romney."

Himes called Ryan Romney's "high priest" of finance with a budget proposal that would cut trillions, but not touch the wealthiest nor the military. Himes said, "That leaves everything else to cut." All domestic programs would be "dramatically squeezed", according to Himes.

The Congressman said the Ryan camp's view of "You are on your own", is "not consistent with how we grew to greatness in this country." Himes, who went to public school, said everyone has gotten help along the way.

A 'Muddle'

"After the election, I think we'll end up with a muddle," Himes said. "The Republicans won't sweep and the Democrats won't sweep it. With the exception of the crazy Far Right, I think most will realize, 'We have four years, so lets get something done.'"

Himes does not believe a new spirit of cooperation will move both political parties to work together. The fact that the country is heading toward a "fiscal cliff" unless a budget agreement can avoid another major recession is what will force action, he said.

Though the country should reduce the deficit, Himes said it also must invest in things that make America prosperous, such as transportation and education. The No Child Left Behind Act will soon be up for re-authorization, he said.

Immigration and energy are also big issues, according to Himes.

Stressing the importance of this election, Himes noted that the next President will most likely be appointing the next two Supreme Court Justices.

'We Want You to Win'

After Himes answered questions in the Mounts' living room, Burnaska said, "We want you to win." Her strong support was echoed by others at the weekend get-together.

Kapoor said, "Jim Himes has been awarded the Economic Patriot Award from the Concord Coalition. He is a rising star, according to Washingtonian Magazine and was one of only 38 Congressman to support a bipartisan budget compromise in the House. These awards and his working across the aisle is what makes him a great leader in this district. His opponent has been vague and non-committal and would be another Republican vote, while Jim Himes is independent, bipartisan and reads the bill."

Michele Mount said she and her husband first got to know Himes during his first Congressional campaign. During that time, Michele Mount was running for state representative in the 112th District.

"He shared his views and they squared with mine," Michele said. "Jim stayed true to his values and he remains in it for the people."

Michael said, "I sat down with Jim outside these events and he impressed me as an innovator and he's a Rhodes Scholar."

He also believes Himes' financial background serves him well in his position. "He's not a career politician," Michael Mount said. "He's a true social servant doing it because he can right now."

Ed Smith October 15, 2012 at 10:50 PM
If the candidates only told the truth: Himes: If re-elected, I promise to continue selling out the country to foreign interests, since my wealthy constituency have divorced themselves from the interests of the country. Obsitnik: I could do a better job of that, Mr. Himes, AND use submarines to start a war. Himes: I doubt you could sell out the country as well as I have. Take for example all the Free Trade Agreements I advocated and voted "yes" for. Just the KROKUS FTA alone that I proudly signed has increased our country's trade deficit by $1.5 Billion per month since it went into effect: http://www.arirang.co.kr/News/News_View.asp?code=Ne4&nseq=137964 I proudly voted yes on the Colombia and Panama FTAs as well. Obsitnik: Well I have a job-creation plan that completely ignores trade policy in all my campaign literature. My plan to help the 1% continue exporting American jobs through bipartisan "free trade" policy does not require revealing my intentions to the voters or the press beforehand. It is enough that I parrot easy-to-understand free market mythologies that already pervade public discourse.
Ed Smith October 15, 2012 at 10:51 PM
Himes: Well I can do even more than you in turning the liquidation of the American middle class into a profitable venture for my real constituents on Wall Street. My old friends at Goldman Sachs made so many $billions on the last 2 bubbles that I have a plan to allow them to do it again: my H.R. 3283 helps gut the Dodd-Frank phony regulation reform even further, it exempts foreign affiliates of U.S. swaps dealers from all Dodd-Frank oversight. Remember that AIG was undone by half a trillion dollars in derivative bets produced by such a foreign affiliate – its London-based financial products outfit, AIGFP. My plan is to move those traders to the most lenient country they can find, then play the NYSE casino from there: http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/how-wall-street-killed-financial-reform-20120510#ixzz2905sbZOp Obsitnik: Common wisdom says govt can only create uncertainty and inefficiency so I disagree with your tiny chisel approach to what should be a wholesale return to the deregulation that led to our bubbles of the past 2 decades. Your special favors for your financial house campaign donors approach is itself a terribly inefficient way to dismantle a whole government of regulations.
Ed Smith October 15, 2012 at 10:51 PM
Himes: You want to dismantle the govt? Obsitnik: Of course not, but everyone knows my party has been taken over by extremists who reflexively say only the private owners of wealth should control the economy in which 200 million work. Why would I ever say anything good about govt when there is a tiny possibility it could fall into the hands of the people?
Ed Smith October 15, 2012 at 10:52 PM
Himes: I'm not done listing the ways I can sell out the American people. Take our diplomacy. I have proven my reliability to the most extreme rightwing Israeli politicians that I will always support anything Israel's govt or settlers do to continue stealing land from the Palestinan people and prevent the creation of a viable Palestinian state, since the debate is not yet over in Israel itself re: where their expansionism will stop. I think the "blank check" policy we have had in practice is much better than the more even-handed positions we used to take in formal statements. What do I care it is not in the national interest to be so one-sided and unconditional in supporting one other country in the world? Obsitnik: If I man the customer service desk at State, I'd do like Romney and say to Israel's PM "what can we do for you today?" After all, it not only makes good domestic politics but also ratchets up the multiple permanent wars so my friends at all the armaments companies and foreign base suppliers can make great money on more American debt. Only under such constant global warfare can our Republic forget our Constitution and Bill of Rights for the sake of militarism.
Ed Smith October 15, 2012 at 10:53 PM
Himes: Let's get back to those FTAs I'm so proud help my friends the CEOs and predatory Wall Street houses make so many billions exporting the American industrial ecosystem. Everyone knows nobody knows much about the biggest free-trade treaty yet, being secretly negotiated by 600 corporate agents without any Congressional oversight, by the leader of my party, Barack Obama. My track record on FTAs speaks for itself, let the Wall Street donations and bonuses roll on please. Obsitnik: I have repeatedly said absolutely nothing on the real effects of "free trade" and intend to continue saying nothing about it until people understand that it has exported 1/3 of our mfg jobs in a decade, 16,000 more in Sept, after 22,000 in August. The only thing I will say is what has been said ever since the launching of the Open Door Policy over a hundred years ago: "If only we could put a shirt on every Chinaman's back, we'd be rich!" However, I will cast China's sovereign right to conduct their trade and economic policies as they choose into excuse for those wars I will promote globally.
Ed Smith October 15, 2012 at 10:55 PM
Himes: You are so absolutely right about China, as you are on everything else, if not in exactly how you say it, certainly in how either of us would actually rule. You know I will always accuse China of everything bad like torture and lack of due process because at least I had the decency to do the same thing by voting "yes" on the NDAA 2012 that supposedly suspends the Bill of Rights in cases where the President asserts secret evidence someone is a terrorist. In those cases everyone knows it is Constitutional to do the unConstitutional, namely let the President make and execute kill lists and indefinite detentions without any due process of law. Obsitnik: You can have the last word, since your President didn't say much in the Debate beyond agreeing we should dismantle Social Security (and by implication Medicare) as quickly as the American people will allow. I really appreciate the bipartisan spirit of your party leaders like Erskine Bowles on these kinds of things that are very important to the 1% who don't want to save Social Security by eliminating the income cap on SS taxes and by creating a small financial transaction tax on short-term asset purchases, which would "save" SS beyond the 75 year projections of the SSA. Himes: You have to admit my party is full of leaders! http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2012/sep/10/erskine-bowles-wall-street-influence-washington
Ed Smith October 15, 2012 at 10:56 PM
Obsitnik: Thanks for letting me have the last word, Jim. About that terrorism war for which we have been tearing up not only the dollar but the Constitution, wasn't that the domestic terrorism office in the White House coordinating harsh police repression in multiple cities of the OWS protesters, those book-readers who have openly asserted their non-violent political doctrines? Himes: Thanks for bringing that up Steve, as you know Wall Street always has the last word in American politics so I'll take what we have coming to us. My wealthy constituents are perfectly content with my President and my performance as well as that of my party colleagues, though they know they will be perfectly safe under your party too. They don't actually need to care which of us get elected, do they?

Boards

More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »